<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Maleny Philosopher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malenyphilosopher.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malenyphilosopher.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the hill</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re-patterning Civilization by DannyBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.malenyphilosopher.com/2010/10/repatterning-civilization/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malenyphilosopher.com/wordpress/?p=355#comment-39</guid>
		<description>I have only read the beginning so far but I have a minor quibble with your definition of economies of scale.

I thought the idea was simply to allocate fixed overhead costs across as many transactions as possible, thus reducing the per-transaction cost.

The idea of &quot;externalities&quot; was a way of taking those overheads off your books and making them someone else&#039;s problem, eliminating them from the transaction entirely. Does this come under the term economy of scale or should it be identified as a different strategy altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only read the beginning so far but I have a minor quibble with your definition of economies of scale.</p>
<p>I thought the idea was simply to allocate fixed overhead costs across as many transactions as possible, thus reducing the per-transaction cost.</p>
<p>The idea of &#8220;externalities&#8221; was a way of taking those overheads off your books and making them someone else&#8217;s problem, eliminating them from the transaction entirely. Does this come under the term economy of scale or should it be identified as a different strategy altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

